Autonomous Labs

Claire Adjiman and Victor Zavala
Organizers and Session Co-Chairs

Session Synopsis

Claire Adjiman

Autonomous or self-driving labs (SDLs) that combine experimental platforms, advanced measurement systems, robotics, automation, and decision-making are ushering in a revolution in materials discovery. The integration of these many elements into SDLs that can be used to design sustainable materials and products to be manufactured at scale poses many process systems engineering challenges. These are driven in part by the need to explore poorly understood materials/formulations for which experimental failure rates and uncertainty are high. Beyond product design, questions arise on what roles SDLs, which typically operate at a very small scale, can play in process development and scale-up and how they can enhance existing approaches to process synthesis and design.

Michael Baldea

Invited Talks

Gaining Autonomy from the Lab to Production

Trust the Robots: Closed-loop Automated Flow and Batch Polymerizations

Mariano Nicolas Cruz Bournazou

Institute of Biotechnology
Technical University Berlin
Germany

Tanja Junkers

School of Chemistry
Monash University
Australia

Abstract

In the next-generation, AI-driven era of science (“the Era of Experience,” Sutton), artificial intelligence’s ability to autonomously generate informative data, and even knowledge, is already transforming process systems in biochemical and chemical engineering. At the heart of this transformation is the concept of cognitive self-driving laboratories. These laboratories are evolving into machines of autonomous discovery, enabling AI systems to propose, test, and refine hypotheses, thereby accelerating scientific breakthroughs and uncovering complex causal relationships.

As these agents execute increasingly complex laboratory, cognitive, and decision-making tasks, engineering challenges in process design and scale-up can now be addressed. We will focus our discussion on four key components:

  • Data, information, and knowledge: Existing and autonomously generated data must be transformed into interoperable and machine-actionable knowledge. AI has shown the potential for thorough information management, but standards and procedures must mature to ensure automated FAIR-by-design generation of experimental results.
  • Trustworthy knowledge exchange: we need platforms that enable a transparent, secure, immutable, and traceable smart-contract–based exchange of information to promote collaboration and open science.
  • Scaling up: Process dynamics, plant-wide optimization, and large-scale difficulties pose specific challenges that differ significantly from existing AI applications. Although several tools have demonstrated strong performance, many issues remain unresolved; controlling dynamic processes, for example, remains an open challenge.

Tackling societal and industrial challenges: As agents gain autonomy, traditional objective and reward functions must be reshaped. Agents should consider the environmental and societal consequences of their suggestions to ensure beneficial development.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) applications increase exponentially in daily life and in scientific discovery. Whereas ML was a speciality in the workflow of a chemist just a decade ago, it has become widespread and penetrates almost every aspect of the scientific process, either by direct application to scientific problems, or by making use of AI agents in the organization of work or screening of literature. While ML and AI have proven to be very powerful, they are, however, at all times limited in the abilities by the quality and quantity of available data. Thus, for a true expansion of knowledge in the future by using these methodologies, we will need to find ways to provide chemical data on scale.

Robotic workflows are ideal to serve in this function. Not only are robots able to provide data continuously, they are also, at least in principle, more reliable in that they work without human bias, and with high reproducibility.  Consequently, we observe the creation of more and more sophisticated robotic laboratories, ranging from simple high-throughput experimentation to integrated closed-loop analysis and automated optimization of reactions.  We will discuss the advances that have been made in the last years with respect to automated continuous flow as well as batch reactors in relation to online analytics that allow to not only synthesize polymer materials on scale, but also to provide characterization of these materials at the same time. Challenges in the process will be highlighted and needs for future developments and integrations will be highlighted.

Short Oral Presentations

Human-Oriented Reinforcement Learning for Innovation and Novelty Search in Self-Driving Laboratories

Antonio del Rio Chanona and Calvin Tsay, Imperial College London, UK

 

From Optimal Experiments to Optimal Experimental Campaigns

Calvin Tsay, Imperial College London, UK

 

Beyond Bayesian Optimization: Decision Architectures for Self-Driving Laboratories

Bhushan Gopaluni, University of British Columbia, Canada

Poster Presentations

Making AI/ML an Everyone’s Game: Overcoming the Hype

Iiro Harjunkoski, Aalto University, Finland

 

Modeling and Control of Nonlinear Systems with Time-varying Characteristics

Ali Cinar, Mudassir Rashid, Mohammad Ahmadasas, Mate Siket, and Mustafa Bilgic

Illinois Institute of Technology, USA and Obuda University, Hungary

 

Generative AI in Biopharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing

Seongkyu Yoon, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA

 

Feature-Space Engineering for Autonomous Plants: Rethinking Data Topology in Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Isaac Severinsen, Bryan Li, and Brent Young, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Challenges and Opportunities in Direct Lithium Extraction from Emerging Feedstocks: A Process Systems Engineering Perspective

Burcu Beykal, University of Connecticut, USA

 

Valorizing Historical Data Toward Pharmaceutical Process Development Intelligence

Ulderico Di Caprio and Artur M. Schweidtmann, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

 

Hard Constraints in Machine Learning for PSE: Paradigms and Open Questions

Giacomo Lastrucci and Artur M. Schweidtmann, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

 

Physics-informed Machine Learning on Steam-Turbine Vibrations

Charilaos Kazakos and Ioannis Georgiou, HELLENiQ Energy, Greece

Reflections on Translating PSE Research into Commercial Impact in the Age of AI

Michael Short, University of Surrey, UK

 

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Chemical Process Simulation, Parameter Estimation, and Real-Time Operation

Sepehr Aarabi Dahej and Christopher L.E. Swartz, McMaster University, Canada

 

Towards an Autonomous Multi-Agent LLM Framework to Harmonize Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Data for Supply Chain Optimization

Styliani Avraamidou, Meng-Lin Tsai, Parth Brahmbhatt, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

 

Beyond Model Discovery: The Need for Identifiability-aware Hybrid Modeling frameworks in PSE

Massimiliano Barolo and Fabrizio Bezzo, University of Padova, Italy